Placement
Which model weights, experts, indexes, or caches should occupy HBF—and for how long?
Literature index / 15 works
The literature is converging on a more precise question: not whether dense flash can sit near compute, but which workloads survive its latency, access granularity, and write limits.
Open research axes / 01
Which model weights, experts, indexes, or caches should occupy HBF—and for how long?
Can tensor layout and batching absorb NAND page-level access without wasting bandwidth?
Which write-heavy inference paths age flash too quickly, and what policies contain that cost?
Should data movement be managed by hardware, the runtime, the model server, or all three?
Live debate / 02
The strongest 2026 papers do not divide neatly into “for” and “against.” They identify read-dominant residency and large static structures as promising, while treating transient KV caches and small irregular accesses as much harder.
Peer-reviewed / 03
A hardware-managed heterogeneous memory proposal that studies how data can move between HBM and high-bandwidth flash during LLM inference.
The paper examines the performance and lifetime consequences of placing write-intensive transformer KV caches in HBF.
A system proposal for pooling HBM and HBF behind a custom logic die to support terabyte-scale inference memory footprints.
The authors evaluate where HBF's density can help modern LLM serving and identify the architectural and software challenges that follow from NAND behavior.
An accessible technical overview of HBF's proposed architecture, motivation, and place in next-generation AI systems.
A survey and research agenda for inference hardware that situates emerging memory tiers, including HBF, inside the wider model-serving bottleneck.
The paper evaluates a heterogeneous HBM-HBF design for serving large language models under memory-capacity and cost constraints.
A package-level study of a hybrid HBM-HBF memory architecture using glass interconnect technology for large-model inference.
Working record / 04
The paper explores capacity-oriented HBF uses in LLM serving, including model residency, expert replication, and multi-model deployment.
The study argues that HBF performs poorly as a drop-in SSD replacement for transient KV-cache traffic, while identifying selective, more read-oriented uses where it can remain valuable.
A full-stack proposal for integrating high-bandwidth flash into AI systems, spanning media behavior, data movement, and model execution.
TileLens explores data layouts intended to reduce the mismatch between accelerator tensor access and flash's comparatively large transfer granularity.
The paper compares HBF-like flash with on-package LPDDR and argues that writability and KV-cache behavior can favor DRAM-based alternatives.
A design-space exploration framework for AI inference systems that includes HBF among possible capacity, bandwidth, and cost tradeoffs.
HAVEN proposes using HBF as a high-capacity tier for approximate nearest-neighbor search, moving beyond the dominant LLM-weight use case.